|
Kick Assiest Blog
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
Vivi
Mood:
 silly
Topic: Lib Loser Stories
Shock Photo of Rosie O'Donut's Daughter Wearing Bullet Belt Causes Stir at Her Own Blog... A picture provokes a thousand libtard posts  Don't EVER ask me to explain why the moron does what she does, but Rosie O'Donut posted a pic of her little girl Vivi -- wearing a bullet belt -- at her blog. And the peacenik pacifist, hyper sensative, gutless pussy, candy ass libtards had a fit! Here's some of my favorite whiney-ass libtarded comments...
Jessi
My god… that picture. I can’t stop crying. This war is such bullshit. Bill
Ro- So dissapointed to see your little ones with bullets…where are the guns? I thought for sure you would protect them more from such things…The internet is NOT OK…but bullets ARE?? Why Why?? The full effect of piss-lava libtardation has to be seen for yourself at her blog... Rosie.com ~ ro ** a picture says a thousand posts
Posted by yaahoo_
at 4:12 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 27 June 2007 4:45 AM EDT
Pool
Mood:
 spacey
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff
Women Arrested, Accused Of Bathroom Sex In Front Of Children At Pool  Third Woman Photographed Alleged Sex Acts, Police Say
 Two women in Seminole County, Fla., are accused of performing sex acts in front of children at a community pool bathroom while a third woman photographed them, according to a police report. Seminole County sheriff's deputies arrested Emily Hernandez and Johannie Jimenez over the weekend at the Casselberry public bathroom. A woman told police that she was walking into the bathroom with her children, and noticed Hernandez and Jimenez naked and apparently performing oral sex. She said another woman was photographing the acts. The pregnant mother said she tried to leave the area with her children but the women would not let her leave. She said she was threatened not to call the police.  The woman eventually left the area with her children unharmed, police said.
Hernandez and Jimenez face lewd and lascivious exhibition charges as well as battery on a pregnant person, false imprisonment of an adult and child under 13 years old. While the women were being transported to the Seminole County Jail, an officer said that Hernandez apparently bit Jimenez inside the patrol car, according to the police report.  Watch Local 6 News for more on this story.
Video: Police: Bathroom Sex In Front Of Kids Leads To Arrests
Local6.com ** Women Arrested, Accused Of Bathroom Sex In Front Of Children
Posted by yaahoo_
at 3:24 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 3:44 PM EDT
Parents
Mood:
 irritated
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff
Parents Arrested For Leaving Toddler In Florida Sun  Parents Accused Of Leaving Toddler In Sun For 45 Minutes At Disney Ride Sheriff's Office: Girl Found Covered In Sweat, Nearly Lifeless   ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Two Orange County parents face child abuse charges after riding the "Pirates of the Caribbean" ride at Walt Disney World -- with their toddler left in a stroller in the sun for about 45 minutes.
Authorities said concerned guests moved a sleeping girl's stroller out of direct sunlight Monday and into some shade and called for help. When investigators found the parents, they said  there was confusion about who had the child. The parents told investigators they accidentally left the 3-year-old girl in the stroller on Saturday afternoon. They were with a group of other adults and children, and each parent thought the other had the girl.  According to the Orange County Sheriff's Office, the girl was found in the sun, turning red, covered in sweat and nearly lifeless.
Paramedics revived the girl after taking her indoors and giving her water. Each parent was released from the Orange County jail on $2,500 bail. Their children have been turned over to relatives while the Department of Children and Families investigates. Watch Local 6 News for more on this story.  Photos: Images From Story - Video: Parents Charged After Child Found Alone At Disney
Local6.com ~ AP ** Parents Accused Of Leaving Toddler In Sun For 45 Minutes At Disney Ride
Posted by yaahoo_
at 2:46 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 3:39 PM EDT
Warming
Mood:
 cool
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff
UK Survey finds 71% of people believe global warming 'natural occurrence' Source: UK Life Style Extra ---- UK News Three Quarters Believe Global Warming A 'Natural Occurrence'  Almost three quarters of people believe global warming is a 'natural occurrence' and not a result of carbon emissions, a survey claimed today.
This goes against the views of the vast majority of scientists who believe the rise in the earth's temperatures is due to pollution. The online study which polled nearly 4000 votes found that a staggering 71 percent of people think that the rise in air temperature happens naturally. And 65 percent think that scientists' catastrophic predictions if pollution isn't curbed are 'far fetched'. Emma Hardcastle, publisher at Pocket Issue which carried out the research, said: "If 71% of people feel that Man has nothing to do with the recent change in our climate then those same people are not going to buy into any movement to reduce their carbon footprint.  "We need to make it clear that there is nothing natural about the significant rise in both carbon emissions and global temperatures since the industrial revolution.
"Pocket Issue’s brief is to help people to understand the facts, encouraging them to click through to a carbon counter as a result. "Pocket Issue feel that the poll highlights the need for government and influential bodies to concentrate on getting the public to understand the facts about global warming and ‘why’ rather than ‘how’ they should reduce their carbon footprint." The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which represents most scientists, stated earlier that the increase in global temperatures is 'very likely due to the observed increase of man-made greenhouse gas concentrations'. They define very likely as 'more than 90 percent certain'. UK Life Style Extra ** Three Quarters Believe Global Warming A 'Natural Occurrence'
Posted by yaahoo_
at 2:35 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 27 June 2007 6:19 AM EDT
Pics
Mood:
 special
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff
Photos You Won't See in The Lame-stream Media Even though you've probably seen at least one of these photos, just posting them on the off-chance a libtard dares to click here... Click pics for full size images...  
 
 
Posted by yaahoo_
at 5:23 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 5:52 AM EDT
Kiss
Mood:
silly
Now Playing: LIBTARD EDUCATION ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories
NJ School Sorry for Censoring Gay Kiss... District Sorry for Censoring Gay Kiss  NEWARK, N.J. -- The school district said Monday it regretted ordering a picture of a male student kissing his boyfriend blacked out from all copies of a high school yearbook and said it apologized to the student.
Andre Jackson, the student, said he was disappointed that the superintendent had not delivered the apology face-to-face and in public. Because of that, he said he didn't accept it as sincere. "I would accept an apology - a public apology," said Jackson, 18. Jackson said he learned of the apology through the media. The district issued a statement Monday saying it regretted the decision and that it would issue an unredacted version of the yearbook to any student of East Side High School who wants one. "The decision was based, in part, on misinformation that Mr. Jackson was not one of our students and our review simply focused on the suggestive nature of the photograph," the district said.  "Superintendent Marion A. Bolden personally apologizes to Mr. Jackson and regrets any embarrassment and unwanted attention the matter has brought to him."
District spokeswoman Valerie Merritt said Bolden would meet with Jackson on Tuesday. But Steven Goldstein, chairman of the gay rights group Garden State Equality, said Jackson had not heard from the district by 10 p.m. Monday. "They don't have a meeting set up, it's not true," Goldstein said. "The school district hasn't contacted him. Whether they reach out to him on Tuesday remains to be seen." Jackson said his teachers, classmates and his parents all knew he was gay and that his sexual orientation was never a problem at school. "I've never had to deal with this before," he said. "It's shocking. It's crazy." Previously, Bolden had described the picture, which showed Jackson kissing boyfriend David Escobales, as "illicit." "If it was either heterosexual or gay, it should have been blacked out. It's how they posed for the picture," Bolden told The Star-Ledger of Newark for Saturday's editions. In the 4 1/2-by-5-inch photo, Jackson is seen turning his head back over his right shoulder and kissing Escobales, 19, of Allentown, Pa. It was blacked out after Russell Garris, the district's assistant superintendent who oversees the city's high schools, told Bolden he was concerned that the photo could upset parents. The photo was among several that appeared on a special personal tribute page in the yearbook. Jackson, who paid $150 for the page, noted that the yearbook is filled with pictures of heterosexual couples kissing.  Newark public schools have about 42,000 students, making it the largest district in New Jersey.
On the Net: Newark schools
Tampa Bay Online ~ Associated Press - Jeffrey Gold ** District Sorry for Censoring Gay Kiss Reading this put me on the verge of throwing up. Straight or gay, why does a yearbook need pictures of students kissing? Why not just skip any photos that have a "suggestive nature" in the first place? Sorry, I'm making sense and public education can’t have that. So I guess the John Travolta picture would be out.
Posted by yaahoo_
at 4:53 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 4:59 AM EDT
Rulings
Mood:
 chatty
Topic: News
Court bars atheists' suit against faith-based plan  WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration's faith-based initiatives got a boost Monday from the Supreme Court: a ruling that ordinary taxpayers cannot sue to stop conferences that help religious charities apply for federal grants.
President Bush called the 5-4 decision "a substantial victory for efforts by Americans to more effectively aid our neighbors in need of help." The court blocked a lawsuit by a group of atheists and agnostics against eight Bush administration officials including the head of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.  ↓
↓
The taxpayers set out "a parade of horribles" they contended could happen, Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority. None did and "in the unlikely event that any of these executive actions did take place, Congress could quickly step in," he wrote. The ruling's effects are limited, opponents said. "Most church-state lawsuits, including those that challenge congressional appropriations for faith-based programs, will not be affected," said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. Lynn called Alito's statement that Congress could step in "quite incredible because the damage is done when the president acts." Lynn said Congress cannot anticipate action by the president that might violate the constitutional separation of church and state. "We have the courts to do precisely this, rein in the president or the Congress," he said.  The taxpayers' group, the Freedom From Religion Foundation Inc., objected to government conferences in which administration officials encourage religious charities to apply for federal money.
The justices' decision revolved around a 1968 Supreme Court ruling that enabled taxpayers to challenge government programs that promote religion. That earlier decision involved the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which financed teaching and instructional materials in religious schools in low-income areas. "This case falls outside" the narrow exception allowing such lawsuits to proceed, Alito wrote. Congress must provide a specific appropriation, he said, and in the suit over the administration conferences the White House pulled the money out of general appropriations. In dissent, Justice David Souter said the court should have allowed the challenge to proceed. The majority "closes the door on these taxpayers because the executive branch, and not the legislative branch, caused their injury," wrote Souter. "I see no basis for this distinction."  Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas would have gone further that the rest of the court, favoring a repudiation of the 1968 decision that in certain instances allows taxpayer lawsuits.
"We had an opportunity today to erase this blot on our jurisprudence, but instead have simply smudged it," Scalia wrote. With the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, Bush says he wants to level the playing field so religious charities and secular charities compete for government money on an equal footing. Jim Towey, formerly head of the White House office, said the ruling is "good news for addicts and the homeless and others seeking effective social services." "It's also a repudiation of the kind of secular extremism that ruled the public square for decades," said Towey, now president of Saint Vincent College in Latrobe, Pa.   "It's a bad day for the First Amendment. The Supreme Court just put a big dent in the wall of separation between church and state," said Ralph G. Neas, president of People For the American Way Foundation, a liberal-oriented group.
The White House program appears to have had a substantial impact. In fiscal 2005, seven federal agencies awarded $2.1 billion to religious charities, according to a White House report. That was up 7 percent from the year before and represented 10.9 percent of the grants from the seven federal agencies providing money to faith-based groups. Among the programs: Substance abuse treatment, housing for AIDS patients, community re-entry for inmates, housing for homeless veterans and emergency food assistance. Yahoo News ~ Associated Press - Pete Yost ** Court bars suit against faith-based plan
Related: Supreme Court Kills Part of McCain-Feingold...
Yahoo News ~ Associated Press - Mark Sherman ** Court allows issue ads near elections
Posted by yaahoo_
at 4:14 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 4:22 AM EDT
Charity
Mood:
 happy
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff
Americans give record $295B to charity, Twice as much as the next most charitable  NEW YORK -- Americans gave nearly $300 billion to charitable causes last year, setting a record and besting the 2005 total that had been boosted by a surge in aid to victims of hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma and the Asian tsunami.
Donors contributed an estimated $295.02 billion in 2006, a 1% increase when adjusted for inflation, up from $283.05 billion in 2005. Excluding donations for disaster relief, the total rose 3.2%, inflation-adjusted, according to an annual report released Monday by the Giving USA Foundation at Indiana University's Center on Philanthropy. Giving historically tracks the health of the overall economy, with the rise amounting to about one-third the rise in the stock market, according to Giving USA. Last year was right on target, with a 3.2% rise as stocks rose more than 10% on an inflation-adjusted basis. "What people find especially interesting about this, and it's true year after year, that such a high percentage comes from individual donors," Giving USA Chairman Richard Jolly said.  Individuals gave a combined 75.6% of the total. With bequests, that rises to 83.4%.
The biggest chunk of the donations, $96.82 billion or 32.8%, went to religious organizations. The second largest slice, $40.98 billion or 13.9%, went to education, including gifts to colleges, universities and libraries. About 65% of households with incomes less than $100,000 give to charity, the report showed. "It tells you something about American culture that is unlike any other country," said Claire Gaudiani, a professor at NYU's Heyman Center for Philanthropy and author of The Greater Good: How Philanthropy Drives the American Economy and Can Save Capitalism. Gaudiani said the willingness of Americans to give cuts across income levels, and their investments go to developing ideas, inventions and people to the benefit of the overall economy. Gaudiani said Americans give twice as much as the next most charitable country, according to a November 2006 comparison done by the Charities Aid Foundation. In philanthropic giving as a percentage of gross domestic product, the U.S. ranked first at 1.7%. No. 2 Britain gave 0.73%, while France, with a 0.14% rate, trailed such countries as South Africa, Singapore, Turkey and Germany.  Mega-gifts, which Giving USA considers to be donations of $1 billion or more, tend to get the most attention, and that was true last year especially.
Investment superstar Warren Buffett announced in June 2006 that he would give $30 billion over 20 years to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Of that total, $1.9 billion was given in 2006, which helped push the year's total higher. Gaudiani said that gift reflects a growing focus on using donated money efficiently and effectively. "I think it's also a strategic commitment to upward mobility exported to other countries, in the form of improved health and stronger civil societies," she said.  The Gates Foundation has focused on reducing hunger and fighting disease in developing countries as well as improving education in the U.S. Without Buffett's pledge, it had an endowment of $29.2 billion as of the end of 2005.
Meanwhile, companies and their foundations gave less in 2006, dropping 10.5% to $12.72 billion. Jolly said corporate giving fell because companies had been so generous in response to the natural disasters and because profits overall were less strong in 2006 over the year before. The Giving USA report counts money given to foundations as well as grants the foundations make to non-profits and other groups, since foundations typically give out only income earned without spending the original donations. USA Today ~ Associated Press ** Americans give record $295B to charity
To hear the libtarded UN, and their brain-dead stooges say it... "all Americans are greedy misers, who could care less about their fellow man." But we know the truth, and at the end of the day, that's all that matters... Conservatives Are More Generous,
Right-wingers 'Outgive' Libtards Regarding Charities
Posted by yaahoo_
at 3:38 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 3:45 AM EDT
Hillary
Mood:
 d'oh
Topic: Lib Loser Stories
'Smoking Gun' Hillary Clintax Tape Released to Public  The video described in a civil suit as "smoking gun" evidence that Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) committed felonies became available on the Internet Friday.
On the tape the former first lady and leading Democratic presidential contender is heard speaking in 2000 with Hollywood mogul Peter Paul, comic book icon Stan Lee, and director Aaron Tonkin about a massive fundraising event for her 2000 Senate race. Paul spent about $2 million of his own money to produce the event but later had a fallout with the Clintons. If she helped to plan the event, it could legally constitute a direct hard money donation to Clinton's Senate campaign, rather than to her joint fundraising committee called New York Senate 2000. If that is the case, the donation from Paul would be a thousand times the legal limit of $2,000. Knowingly soliciting a contribution of $25,000 or more is a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. The conversation appears to show Clinton actively helping to plan the event. The suit alleges that she violated federal campaign finance laws by directly soliciting a contribution from Paul. "And you know, Aaron, I'm so grateful because I know how hard you've worked on it because it's your constant effort and outreach," Clinton is heard to say over a speaker phone. "You know, I talked with [celebrity singer] Cher and she was just great. Said she was really so excited. And I hadn't talked to her so you must have done a really good job selling it to her."  At no point did Clinton suggest that the event and the Paul donation were not going directly to her campaign, even as the other three in the conversation referenced it repeatedly.
Tonkin later is heard to say, "We've got people like Cher and others that have really never done anything before that are like coming out in full force knowing this is for your Senate race, it's unbelievable." "I'm just thrilled," Clinton answers. "I'll check in with you from time to time because I know that putting something like this together is challenging even when people are enthusiastic and looking forward to doing it. It's still, there's so much work that's involved." In an exclusive story published in April, Cybercast News Service was first to report the existence of the tape. The United States Justice Foundation, a conservative group, filed a brief Thursday with the California Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District, asking that the tape be admitted.  "The evidence is of that rare type that captures the very commission of a crime, namely, that of knowingly soliciting, coordinating and accepting federal campaign contributions far in excess of the legal limit of $2,000," the motion filed with the court says.
Clinton and her supporters have maintained that she had no direct knowledge that the event violated campaign finance rules. In a written declaration for the California court filed on April 7, 2006, she said only that she didn't remember discussions with Paul about the fundraiser. "I have no recollection whatsoever of discussing any arrangement with him whereby he would support my campaign for the United States Senate in exchange for anything from me or then-President Clinton," Clinton said in the declaration. "I do not believe I would make such a statement because I believe I would remember such a discussion if it had occurred," she added. The Federal Elections Commission already ruled early last year that Clinton's 2000 campaign committee had underreported cash it received at the fundraising event Paul sponsored. The FEC slapped the campaign committee with a $35,000 fine. The fallout from Paul's Hollywood fundraising event also led to the federal indictment of David Rosen, Clinton's campaign finance director, who was acquitted on charges of lying to the FEC. Cybercast News Service ~ Fred Lucas ** 'Smoking Gun' Clinton Tape Released to Public I'm betting mysterious, single-car accidents involving 'Smoking Gun' staff will occur in the very near future.
Posted by yaahoo_
at 3:03 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 3:09 AM EDT
Monday, 25 June 2007
Ring
Mood:
chatty
Now Playing: LIBTARD EDUCATION ALERT
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff
(UK) Girl Takes School to High Court Over Purity Ring... 'Purity' ring case in High Court  A 16-year-old girl has gone to the High Court to accuse her school of discriminating against Christians by banning the wearing of "purity rings".
Lydia Playfoot was told by Millais School in Horsham, West Sussex, to remove her ring, which symbolises chastity, or face expulsion. The school denies breaching her human rights, insisting the ring is not an essential part of the Christian faith. On Friday, judgement in the case was reserved to a future date. Miss Playfoot says Sikh and Muslim pupils can wear bangles and headscarves in class.  BBC News religious affairs correspondent Robert Piggott said a group of girls at the school were wearing the rings as part of a movement called the "Silver Ring Thing" (SRT).
Human rights barrister Paul Diamond told the High Court the school's action was "forbidden" by law. "Secular authorities and institutions cannot be arbiters of religious faith," Mr Diamond said. He said a question the judge would have to answer was: "What are the religious rights of schoolchildren in the school context?" 'Sexually pure'
Originating in America, SRT promotes abstinence among young people. Our correspondent said it was now spreading to the UK as part of a wider protest by traditionalist Christians against what they see as the secularisation of society.  The rings are inscribed with a reference to the biblical verse I Thessalonians 4:3-4, which translates as: "God wants you to be holy, so you should keep clear of all sexual sin. Then each of you will control your body and live in holiness and honour."
Miss Playfoot's school said her ring broke uniform rules and ordered her to remove it. When she refused, she was taken out of lessons and made to study on her own. She told BBC Breakfast: "In the Bible it says you should remain sexually pure and I think this is a way I want to express my faith." Miss Playfoot is seeking a judicial review under Article Nine of the Human Rights Act which guarantees freedom of religious expression. She says that should protect her right to wear the ring. In a written statement to Deputy Judge Michael Supperstone QC, Miss Playfoot said young girls faced a "moral and ethical crisis" and that other teenage girls at her school had become pregnant.  She said other pupils regularly broke the uniform code with nose rings, tongue studs, badges and dyed hair.
The only reason for banning the rings was because the school refused to "give respect to aspects of the Christian faith they are not familiar with", Miss Playfoot said. "The real reason for the extreme hostility to the wearing of the SRT purity ring is the dislike of the message of sexual restraint which is counter cultural and contrary to societal and governmental policy," she added. But headteacher Leon Nettley, said the school was applying a basic uniform policy, which "has the overwhelming support of pupils and parents". He said her ring was "not a Christian symbol, and is not required to be worn by any branch within Christianity", adding that Lydia was free to display her faith in other ways. Uniform code
Lawyers for the school will insist that it is not operating a discriminatory policy because allowances made for Sikhs and Muslims only occur for items integral to their religious beliefs.  It argues that a Christian pupil would be allowed to wear a crucifix.
In freely choosing the school, lawyers will also say that Miss Playfoot and her parents voluntarily accepted to adhere to the uniform code. Miss Playfoot's first application to the High Court was turned down last year, but judges agreed to hear it after she appealed. Miss Playfoot completed her GCSEs last week and has now left the school. But her father Phil, who is a pastor, said she wanted to pursue the case because of its wider significance for all Christians. "I think there's something bigger at stake here," he said. Messages of support
Mr Playfoot and his wife Heather are part of the volunteer team which runs the UK branch of the Silver Ring Thing from their church in Horsham.  The organisers of the movement say as many as 25,000 young people have joined so far in the UK and that numbers are growing.
Miss Playfoot has received messages of support from politicians, including former Conservative party chairman Lord Tebbit and Tory MP Ann Widdecombe. She also has the backing of the Lawyers Christian Fellowship (LCF) which represents 2,000 Christian lawyers across the UK. The case is being funded through individual donations gathered through the LCF's sister group Christian Concern for our Nation.
Posted by yaahoo_
at 2:15 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 25 June 2007 2:49 AM EDT
Newer | Latest | Older
|
Lydia's argument